发疯了?里沙利松掐埃基蒂克脖子、推索博、肘击弗林蓬,均未染黄(里沙利松连出粗暴动作:掐埃基蒂克、推索博、肘击弗林蓬仍未吃黄牌)
发布时间:2026-01-01

Addressing football match incident

I need to reply to the user's comments about a football match incident, where they mention Brazilian player Richarlison's actions against Ekitike, Szoboszlai, and Frimpong. It sounds like they're upset that no yellow cards were issued. I'll want to provide a calm response, explaining that refereeing decisions can often be subjective and that VAR might have an impact. It could be helpful to ask for more details about the specific match they’re referring to, like the date and competition.Analyzing match incident

I can offer to check the highlights if the user wants, but since the network is uncertain, it’s better to ask a clarifying question instead. I’ll provide a general analysis of why no yellow cards might have been issued. These reasons could include advantage play, unseen off-the-ball incidents, or VAR thresholds. I can reference relevant laws of the game, like Law 12 regarding violent conduct and unsporting behavior. If no red card is warranted, VAR typically won’t intervene for yellow cards. Retrospective action could be possible if it wasn’t initially seen.Offering options for follow-up

I need to provide the user with options: 1) Do they want me to find the clip and analyze it frame-by-frame? 2) Should I prepare a write-up for them to post? 3) Would they like a summary of the appeal or discipline process in the league? I can include definitions of thresholds like "careless," "reckless," and "excessive force," while also mentioning that the standards can differ by competition. Since the user used Chinese, I can respond in Chinese, keeping it concise with about 5-6 bullet points. I'll phrase it carefully to avoid any unverified claims about the match.Crafting a concise response in Chinese

I’ll ask the user which match they're referring to, and I can help lookup rules, match reports, or referee assessments. My response will include:

  • Acknowledging their frustration with "确实离谱" but remaining neutral.
  • Explaining the rules regarding actions like strangulation, pushing, and elbowing, where yellow or red cards depend on the severity.
  • Clarifying that VAR only reviews potential red cards, not yellow cards.
  • Mentioning potential referee oversights or advantages.
  • Highlighting that if officials saw an incident and made a call, retrospective punishment is rare unless there was an error.
  • I could also suggest I can give frame-by-frame analysis if they have a clip.

I’ll keep it brief!

助理可能被

确实让人无语。按规则看,这类动作的判罚区间和当值团队的“力度判定/是否看见”强相关,可能出现未出牌的几个原因:

only

  • 规则门槛:掐脖子/推搡/肘击可从“非必要接触”(警告/黄牌)到“暴力行为”(直接红)不等,关键看力度、部位、是否离球、对对手的危险性。
  • VAR边界:VAR只介入潜在直接红牌,纯黄牌阈值(如轻微推搡)不会触发介入,所以你看到“明显不体面但没黄”的情况并不少见。
  • 视野与优先级:裁判/助理可能被遮挡或把注意力放在持球点;也可能选择“口头警告+比赛管理”而非亮牌。
  • 攒犯规/情绪管理:有时裁判试图用“最后通牒”控场,但确实容易让人觉得尺度失衡。
  • 赛后追罚:若当值团队完全未看到且属暴力行为,联赛可追加处罚;若裁判已目击并作出判定(即便未出牌),多数联赛通常不再事后改判,除非误认人等极端情形。

如果你能提供比赛信息(赛事/对阵/时间)或视频片段,我可以按《竞赛规则》第12条逐项给你做判定建议,顺便评估是否达到VAR红牌阈值,以及有没有可能触发赛后追罚。需要的话我也能帮你整理一段客观的赛后吐槽/规则科普帖。

可能触发赛